![]() Here are the new changes:ġ40 What Apple has done is move the patch they had put at $BA84 down to $B6B3 and added fourġ41 extra lines to that patch. I am going to assume you already have the "early 1983" version,ġ20 either because you bought a //e or a disk drive this year, or you copied one from a friend,ġ21 or you made the patches from my July article. The letter binds developers to begin using the newġ18 If you like APPEND, or would like to like it, you might want to make these patches inġ19 your own system master. Took the first Disk and windows 7 professional prompted asking to use the disc as 'Audio' or 'Data File'. 1983:ġ11 Yet Another New Version of DOS 3.3 Bob Sander-Cederlofġ13 In the July issue of AAL I outlined the changes Apple made to DOS 3.3 early this year.ġ14 Today I received a new "Developer's System Master", with a cover letter claiming anotherġ15 correction to the APPEND routine. How to make CD-RW Blank again I bought a 5 pack CD-RW. a change to Master.DSK in GITHUB so that it matches one of the DOS3.3 images.įrom Apple Assembly Line, Vol.documentation in GITHUB (history, readme, help, etc.). ![]() 3) In the Save As field, type a new for your disk image file. 2) Choose File New Image Blank Image to get started. explanation about Master.DSK and why it is different from a normal DOS image. 1) Open Disk Utility using Spotlight or directly from your /Applications/Utilities/ folder.What do I expect by opening this issue? Possibilities: I'm not sure if I am remembering that correctly or if it even applies here. I seem to recall a long time ago a discussion that indicated there was need for a "special" DOS image to make AppleWin more efficient. One place to see DOS3.3 documentation is: At times this has caused me some confusion.įor example, on T0 S4 is the beginning of the code for MSWAIT In fact, there are code differences between Master.DSK and those 2 images. Master.DSK is not one of those 2 disk images. documentation in GITHUB (history, readme, help, etc.) a change to Master.DSK in GITHUB so that it matches one of the DOS3.3 images. The name "Master" might lead me to believe it is one of the following: nothing explanation about Master.DSK and why it is different from a normal DOS image.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |